Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Crucifixion/archive1

Crucifixion

Note: contents duplicated from [1] to create this page, in order to enable proper linking via {{ArticleHistory}} at the target article. Maralia (talk) 05:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is very well written, with easy to understand and smoothly-reading prose. It is fairly stable, neutral enough for a topic that could have provided a good deal of controversy, and very informative. I'll be interested to see what everyone else thinks... --Wolf530 18:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Neutrality^talk 18:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reason(s) for opposition? - Vedexent 19:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article relies heavily on the 1911 Britannica. There are no citations. Neutrality^talk 20:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks _{(unsigned comment by 222.154.151.123)}

As a note, this is not appearing on the Featured article candidates page. I'm not sure how to rememdy this... --Wolf530 09:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]