Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Brownsea Island Scout camp
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted 00:00, 16 July 2007.
We've put a lot of work into improving this lately and feel it is ready for a FAC run. Brownsea Island was the site of the first camping trip by Robert Baden-Powell in August 1907. This camping trip ignited the worldwide Scouting movement.Rlevse 14:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Especially relevant with the upcoming centenarry. --evrik (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support The article has been greatly improved in recent months, it definately worthy of FA status. LordHarris 00:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Lead should be longer. The Placebo Effect 03:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the recommendation. We edited the lead to be more in line with the body text, and provide more information. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 21:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose: The image Image:Scouting 2007uniform.jpg is a fair use, copyrighted image. It's use here in this article is decorative. It's use is acceptable on Scouting 2007 Centenary, but not here.--Durin 21:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Update: Image has been removed. Opposition removed. --Durin 12:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]- It illustrates the section in question.Rlevse 21:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pointlessly, yes. --Durin 21:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but I agree with Durin on this one; I removed the image he talked about. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pointlessly, yes. --Durin 21:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You're opposing because of one image at the bottom of the article? --BigΔT 04:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not opposing now. Anyways, featured articles need to have images that are either free or acceptable fair use images. That is one of the requirements at WP:WIAFA. Any editor can object to the article becoming FA over image licensing issues. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 04:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It illustrates the section in question.Rlevse 21:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There is obvious disagreement on what "acceptable fair use is". NOTE however: from an example at Wikipedia:Non-free content "A sports card image is a legitimate fair use if it is used only to illustrate an article (or article section) on the card itself;", which is what this image does (or now did), it illustrates the section of the article it was in, which was on the subject of the image.Rlevse 10:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment BigDT and Rlevse are correct. This is perfectly acceptable Fair Use. The image illustrated a section that was on the subject of the image, which is allowed per Wikipedia:Non-free content.Sumoeagle179 10:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support well done.Sumoeagle179 10:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support page was updated to make the image use acceptable. I would encourage the users here to also look at http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=scouting+centenary&l=commderiv&ss=2&ct=0 and other images on Google. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 18:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, but those are tagged "some rights reserved".Rlevse 19:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You're free to email the creators for permission, if some events are still going on, you can take pictures of that. The one I linked should be under the Creative Commons license. Anyways, good article. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, but those are tagged "some rights reserved".Rlevse 19:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support As significant contributor to the article, let me express that this is a topclass article now, well balanced in text and illustration, and covering the subject well. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 23:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.