Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Aston Martin DB11/archive1
Appearance
Aston Martin DB11 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): 750h+ 05:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
This article is about a gorgeous grand tourer, which is the successor to the Aston Martin DB9—the first FA I made. This is my seventh nomination, and underwent a recent GA review by Mertbiol for which I'm very grateful. Thanks for any comments I get. 750h+ 05:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Image review
[edit]Just doing the image review:
- All images have a free license from the photographer on the Commons. All have alt text, captions, and links to the Commons. The Aston Martin logo is de minimis and not a major part of any photo.
For the first caption in "Background", I think it would be more clear to people unfamiliar the cars to have "The DB9
" either link to that car's article or expanded to "Aston Martin DB9" as it is in the body text.
And that's it, Rjjiii (talk) 22:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for the review. 750h+ 23:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Quite welcome. No issues remaining, Rjjiii (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- SC
- I have a few others to do first, but I will review. - SchroCat (talk) 06:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- "at the facility in Gaydon": I think just a little more than "the facility" is needed. Maybe "at the Aston Martin facility in Gaydon"?
- "2004[7][8] at the facility": same here: "2004[7][8] at its facility" will suffice
- "2016 at the facility in Gaydon, Warwickshire": -> "2016 at its facility in Gaydon" (doesn't need Warwickshire mentioned again)
- "a near-perfect weight distribution": the description of 'near-perfect' needs inline attribution I think
- "doors ... are swan-hinged": As this is a semi-technical term, I think you need to explain what it meant by it (see MOS:NOFORCELINK – "do not force a reader to use that link to understand the sentence).
- "humourously" -> "humorously"
That's my lot. Very little to pick up on here – another enjoyable read. - SchroCat (talk) 12:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. the second last concern, i've explained via footnote. Thanks for the review @SchroCat:. 750h+ 12:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. all good from me. - SchroCat (talk) 13:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Source review: pass
[edit]I may as well pick this up while I'm here - SchroCat (talk) 12:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Formatting is consistent and in line with policy and practice
- Additional searches show no missing sources of note
- The sources used are reliable and acceptable for FA.
- Pass of source review. - SchroCat (talk) 13:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Much thanks for the reviews SC! 750h+ 13:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)