Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/All That/archive4

All That

Self-nomination: This article has been FAC'd to death, and I really think it meets all the criteria, ALL of it. The page now includes important information relating to Season 6, which couldn't be added until the Hoku statement was removed. This statement was causing the article to skip over sections, and now the article looks absolutely beautiful, not to mention brilliant. I think it is finally ready for the front page. PF4Eva 23:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object: Overall, a solid article, but not ready to be an FA yet:

There are several instances of questionable grammer/construction ("The cast reunited on the show...", "...where he (like on All That) has honed his impersonation.." etc)
There are several statements that seem to be out of place. For example, is Kenan Thompson's Bill Cosby impersonation something that needs to be mentioned in the opening paragraph? Why does the "Weekly Guest Stars" section in "New Era Begins" begin with a paragraph about guest starts before this "New Era"?
Some statements are unclear: Ex:While the articles on Cold Open, Sketch-Comedy, and musical guests may adequately describe what these aspects of the show are, what exactly is a "Cold open, sketch comedy, musical guest format"? Season 3 and 4 is a particularly foggy section. (Denberg's replacement is mentioned at the end, while Bates' is addressed at the beginning. The focus is entirely on casting, while seasons 1,2,5, and 6 focus on each season as a whole.)

I feel that these need to be addressed a tidied before this article can be featured. (The Swami 01:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Object. The information in the article is not substantiated by reliable sources. —Centrx→talk • 07:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the Hoku statement caused problems because it had an unclosed ref tag. When a named ref is re-used, it has to have a slash at the end, as here. The Hoku unclosed ref tag goes back a while, and was the cause of some other text being deleted. Also, IMDb should be used very cautiously as a reference - other than Writers Guild of America credits, its content is essentially fan-submitted with an undisclosed degree of verification or sources. Gimmetrow 21:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Per Centrx. --Darthphonebook 20:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per Centrx. Nat91 03:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]