Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/AHS Centaur

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 18:00, 19 June 2007.

AHS Centaur

Self nomination. After a sizeable amount of effort, and comments from serveral editors, I am placing this article up for FAC. I believe it meets the criteria for a fratured article. The article is as complete as possible without going into miniature. It covers all aspects of the subject, and all the major published works on the subject have been used at some point. The article's structure is stable, and any revisions will be primarily prose or grammatical in nature.

Here are links for the February peer review, and the May A-class review, both performed by the Military History WikiProject. -- saberwyn 22:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I must confess to making some fairly minor contributions to this article, but in my opinion it is extremely comprehensive, well written and thoroughly referenced. --Nick Dowling 11:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support and comment looks good. Due to the lengthy references section, you might be interested in the reference format used in Tony Blair or Siege of Malakand which I recently came across and found quite useful. Otherwise, great job! SGGH ^speak! 16:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- References now scrolling. Thank you for suggesting it. -- saberwyn 20:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great article full support. Hossen27 03:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, excellent, informative article.--Nydas^(Talk) 09:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support well written, extremely well referenced. Seems complete.Lemmington 19:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - an excellent, well written article, one of the most deserving FACs I have seen in a long time - definitely has my support. My only very minor point is to ask whether there are any relevant external links (either used in the article or otherwise relevant) as is desirable under the Manual of Style? It might be good for the purposes of further reading. JRG 12:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The vast majority of the relevant web-based material has been sourced and is in the bibliography. Of the others the Australian War Memorial page or its subpage(s) may be worth inclusion in a external links section. Researching this, I have found that the majority of the reliable further reading is found in book format (all of which are cited in the article anyway). -- saberwyn 20:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.