Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Metallica/archive1

Metallica

4 articles

Discography

Awards and nominations

Members

Major contributors: M3tal H3ad, Anger22, Burningclean, Gary king, and me.

"The Unforgiven(s)". Nergaal (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Support - it's valid but... last time a similar FTC appeared, it failed. (I know at least two articles will be considered gaps by people ahead). igordebraga ≠ 00:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also Marginally Support because of those two articles, however, IMO they can be merged into the above articles in the FTC.--S R X 03:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - while I supported the aforementioned Nine Inch Nails FTC, I do not support this one, as I feel it is missing two articles I would like to see in an overview topic on this subject - the two that igordebraga mentioned! I think that:

The demos detailed in Metallica demos should be either covered in Metallica discography with some kind of "Demos" section (so then it'd be a subarticle of that one), or Metallica demos should be included in the topic. The first option would be very easy, and probably the better course of action too
List of Metallica concert tours should be included

I would not support any article merging for this FTC, as I think the two articles cover substantial enough topics to merit standing on their own - rst20xx (talk) 03:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are demos relevant enough to be included in the topic??? The demos were such a small part that they did not EVEN get a place in the extended discography article! Nergaal (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The demos article is one within the scope of the topic that is not currently covered adequately by this main topic or any potential subtopic. If it's not going to be included in this topic, it should be included in the discography subtopic, and that's reflected in what I said - rst20xx (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as too selective per rst20xx. –thedemonhog talk • edits 06:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Close with no consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]