Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/1998 Pacific hurricane season
Appearance
1998 Pacific hurricane season
[edit]Main page | Articles |
1998 Pacific hurricane season | Hurricane Isis (1998) - Hurricane Lester (1998) - Hurricane Madeline (1998) |
After two more articles were added and GA'd by User:Juliancolton, I am nomming this topic for FTC, after I got the first two articles to FA. It's a short one, but it's complete. No other storms in the season have articles, and there aren't likely to be any more. They're all linked by a single template, and the three storm articles are all of the same general format. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support as co-nom. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support seems to meet all criteria. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 22:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- There were other storms listed in 1998 Pacific hurricane season that reached hurricane-level. Why do you think that these three storms are the only ones that can have articles about them? --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 17:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Because the remainder of the storms would fail notability guidelines, as they generally stayed out at sea and had little or no effects on land. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support This topic looks good to me. Gary King (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support - quick question though. I feel like I'm being really thick, but where is this template?!? rst20xx (talk) 23:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, appears we forgot about the template. Added {{1998 Pacific hurricane season buttons}} to the articles. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's better! rst20xx (talk) 10:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, appears we forgot about the template. Added {{1998 Pacific hurricane season buttons}} to the articles. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support I'm certain that there has got to have been more hurricanes in 1998, but if that's all the articles there are on Wikipedia, then I'm all for it. 50% FA isn't bad at all, though I'd like to see the topic expanded if possible. --haha169 (talk) 18:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- All of the other storms are adequately covered in the season article, which is featured. The topic could be expanded greatly if every storm got an article, but none of them are really notable enough for their own article. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Close as promote --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 16:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)