Wikipedia:Factual review/reviews/Pipes (example) (one)
Pipes
[edit]Pipes — factual review initiated on March 19, 2008.
Due to the fact that the article on "Pipes" covers an important topic, has not been factually reviewed before, and appears to be well-written, I request that it be factually reviewed. — Thomas H. Larsen 08:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Article sections
[edit]If you wish to participate in this factual review, and you are reasonably knowledgeable about the topic of the article, please assign your name to one or more of the sections listed below. You should be knowledgeable in the sections you intend to review. More than one editor can review one section, but all sections of the article must be reviewed.
Summary
[edit]Factual reviewers: Plumber, Piper
The "Summary" section of the article claims that "... pipes are useless ...", which appears (a) unverifiable, and (b) heavily biased. — Piper
The "Summary" section claims that "... pipes are always grey ...", which is most definitely inaccurate and unverifiable. — Plumber
Uses of pipes
[edit]Factual reviewers: PipeUser, Pied Piper, Plumber
Types of pipes
[edit]Factual reviewers: SquarePipe, Pied Piper, Round Pipe, Cylinder
Materials of pipes
[edit]Factual reviewers: Plastic, Steel Tube
This section of the article claims that "... [a]ll pipes are made from plastic ...", which is false and unverifiable. — Steel Tube
I feel that this section fails to provide adequate coverage, especially in regards to varying materials of pipes — plastic, wooden, stone, concrete, steel, and others. — Plastic
Construction of pipes
[edit]Factual reviewers: Piper, Steel Tube
History of pipes
[edit]Factual reviewers: Plumber
Footnotes
[edit]Factual reviewers: Notetaker, Foot