Wikipedia:Contentious topics/2021-22 review/Phase II consultation/Templates

2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review

Status as of 11:21 (UTC), Thursday, 14 November 2024 (Purge)

The final decision has been posted and announced.
The initial implementation period has concluded and the updated procedure has come into effect.
Any editors interested in the ongoing implementation process are invited to assist at the implementation talk page.
To be notified about updates, subscribe to the update list.

The revision process will be conducted in four phases:

Phase I community consultation (March – April 2021) (closed)
- Closing statement posted (May 2021) (closed)
- Discretionary sanctions topic amendments (February 2022) (closed)
Phase II community consultation (September – October 2022) (closed)
Proposed decision (November – December 2022)
- Public review (November 13 – 18, 2022)
- Final decision (December 2022)
Implementation: The drafting arbitrators will implement the Committee's decision in conjunction with the Committee's clerks and interested volunteers designated by the Committee.

The revision process was managed by drafting arbitrators designated by the Arbitration Committee (CaptainEek, L235, Wugapodes).

Contentious topics alert

You have recently been editing [CT code] which has been designated a contentious topic[LINK]. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard [LINK] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [LINK]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ct/aware}} template.

Code

Extended content

{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{SAFESUBST:<noinclude />Yesno|{{{heading|y}}}|yes=true}}|true|== {{{headtext|Introduction to contentious topics}}} ==|{{{headtext|}}}}}
<includeonly>{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{topic|{{{t|{{{1|}}} }}} }}}|</includeonly>{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text  = You have recently been editing {{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:alert|'''<code>See [[#Codes|#topic codes]] for options</code>'''|{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}Contentious topics/list|scope = {{{topic|{{{t|{{{1}}} }}} }}} }} }} which has been designated a [[WP:AC/CT|contentious topic]]. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and ''does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your editing.''

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as '''contentious topics'''. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. 

Within contentious topics, editors should edit '''carefully''' and '''constructively''', refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
:adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
:comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
:follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
:comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
:refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard [LINK] or you may learn more about this contentious topic {{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:alert|'''<code>See [[#Codes|#topic codes]] for options</code>'''|[[{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}Contentious topics/list|link = {{{topic|{{{t|{{{1}}} }}} }}} }}|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|aware}} template. }}
{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#if:{{{sig|}}}|<includeonly>~~</includeonly>~~}}<includeonly>{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert -->|<span class="error strong" style="font-weight: bold;"><u>Error:</u> The code letters for the affected topic area in this contentious topics alert are not declared. <code>topic=</code> is missing; please [[Template:alert|check the documentation]] and try again.</span>
<div style="border-left: 5px dashed black; border-right: 5px dashed black; border-bottom: 5px dashed black; padding-left: 0.5em; padding-right: 0.5em; padding-bottom: 0.5em;">

Editnotices

No page restrictions

This page is related to a contentious topic(linked).

The Arbitration Committee has designated [TOPIC SCOPE] as a contentious topic. Within designated contentious topics, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

When editing in this topic area, editors are expected to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, expected standards of behaviour, and Wikipedia policy and editorial norms.

Before you make any more edits to pages in this topic area, please familiarise yourself with the contentious topics system.

With page restrictions, admin-imposed only

This page is related to a contentious topic(linked). The following [rule(s)/restriction(s)] apply when editing this page:

[EXAMPLE] Each editor must not make more than one revert per 24 hours on this article.^[1]

If you breach the above [rule(s)/restriction(s)] on this page, you may be blocked or otherwise restricted.

Furthermore, the Arbitration Committee has designated [TOPIC SCOPE] as a contentious topic. Within designated contentious topics, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. When editing in this topic area, editors are expected to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, expected standards of behaviour, and Wikipedia policy and editorial norms.

Before you make any more edits to pages in this topic area, please familiarise yourself with the contentious topics system.

References

^ This restriction was applied to this page by [an administrator] pursuant to the contentious topics procedure and may be appealed as described in that procedure.

With page restrictions, topic-wide restriction applies (GMO example)

This page is related to a contentious topic(linked). The following [rule(s)/restriction(s)] apply when editing this page:

Each editor must not make more than one revert per 24 hours on this article.^[1]

[EXAMPLE] If an edit to this page is challenged via reversion, it may not be reinstated without consensus on the talk page of this article.^[2]

If you breach the above [rule(s)/restriction(s)] on this page, you may be blocked or otherwise restricted.

Furthermore, the Arbitration Committee has designated "genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them" as a contentious topic. Within designated contentious topics, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. When editing in this topic area, editors are expected to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, expected standards of behaviour, and Wikipedia policy and editorial norms.

Before you make any more edits to pages in this topic area, please familiarise yourself with the contentious topics system.

References

^ This restriction applies to all pages [related to TOPIC] in accordance with [ARBCOM DECISION].
^ This restriction was applied to this page by [an administrator] pursuant to the contentious topics procedure and may be appealed as described in that procedure.

Only sections are part of a contentious topic (example, modify the other templates analogously)

Parts of this page are related to a contentious topic(linked).

The Arbitration Committee has designated [TOPIC SCOPE] as a contentious topic. Within designated contentious topics, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

When editing in this topic area, editors are expected to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, expected standards of behaviour, and Wikipedia policy and editorial norms.

Before you make any more edits to pages in this topic area, please familiarise yourself with the contentious topics system.

Talk page notice

minimal changes were made

No page restrictions

With page restrictions

Notice of restriction

[1] This restriction was applied to this page by [an administrator] pursuant to the contentious topics procedure and may be appealed as described in that procedure.

[2] This restriction applies to all pages [related to TOPIC] in accordance with [ARBCOM DECISION].

[3] This restriction was applied to this page by [an administrator] pursuant to the contentious topics procedure and may be appealed as described in that procedure.

[1]

[1]

[2]