Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Andes

Andes

Nominated on 00:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC); needs 18 votes by February 27.

The largest mountain range in South America and one of the most important mountain systems in the world has only a tiny article.

Support:

1. RexNL 00:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
2. Gflores ^Talk 00:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
3. Andrew Levine 06:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
4. Silence 09:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
5. Mr. Billion 19:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
6. RJH 20:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
7. Darwinek 00:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
8. Hahnchen 16:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
9. – Quadell ^{(talk) (bounties)} 02:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
10. --Ehouk1 15:56, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
11. Charm Quark^?? 20:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
12. Fergananim 21:45, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
13. Samsara _contrib ^talk 20:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
14. hike395 06:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
15. Avala 21:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
16. Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
17. Jhohenzollern 03:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
18. Neutrality^talk 07:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
19. Caponer 00:12, 6 February 2006 (UTC).
20. --Raghu 16:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• By the way, if you're curious as to how a central topic remains such a miniscule stub, check the History for some interesting stuff... -Silence 09:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• It seems Gflores took this nomination as an inspiration to expand the article [1]. Good job! RexNL 23:57, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Thanks... it could still use lots of work though. Hopefully it can be brought up to a level similar to the Himalayas. Gflores ^Talk 18:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• As I'm new to this collaboration voting thing, I have a question: If an article improves significantly during nomination period (like this one) is it still eligible to be a collaboration of the week as it now fails the stub criteria? Or should it be moved to Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive? --Petros471 18:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

---