Wikipedia:Coherence (historical)
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Wikipedia Coherence groups a series of guidelines that are neither
- Central policies, as in category:wikipedia official policy and Wikipedia:Five pillars
neither
- Wikipedia style guidelines, as in category:wikipedia style guidelines and wikipedia:Manual of Style
neither
- Wikipedia how-to guidelines, as in category:wikipedia how-to and wikipedia:how-to
neither
- Wikipedia naming conventions guidelines, as in category:wikipedia naming conventions and wikipedia:naming conventions
neither
- Wikipedia deletion guidelines, as in category:wikipedia deletion and wikipedia:deletion
So what is this idea about "Coherency" guidelines, are they in any way important?
- The "coherence" guidelines are not important
- in that you don't need to know anything about them to contribute to wikipedia
- The "coherence" guidelines are extremely important
- in that they give the basic philosophies behind many of the central policies, and help the composition of other wikipedia guidelines stay coherent
Examples of "coherence" guidelines
[edit]- wikipedia:importance - how "importance" is defined is, yeah, important; even the central NPOV policy depends on how "importance" is defined, see NPOV tutorial#Space and balance. Nonetheless the importance guideline is, of course, less important than the NPOV policy itself (which usually can be applied with a merely intuitive understanding of "importance")
- wikipedia:easy navigation - This guideline has few practical recommendations when you're writing wikipedia articles, its main objective is to sort out inconsistencies sometimes creeping into guidelines covering similar topics.