Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/WiMAX

WiMAX

Contains contradictions as to range and bandwidth of standard as well as vague descriptions of these. Also, external references are not handled in a satisfactory way for the article. It would be preferable if they were listed at the end and referenced by numbers instead of repeating inline external links. Additionally, the structure of the article is not very organized and makes claims contradicting other articles (for example that UMTS being a direct competitor to WiMAX) Frenchwhale 17:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added to User:Computerjoe/Desk RJFJR 22:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too busy ATM, sorry. Computerjoe 's talk 17:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This still has some work, I dislike the wording for a start. I'll make a start sometime soonish. Computerjoe 's talk 15:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm available if you need any help, I just figured it would be too much to do on my own. --Frenchwhale 14:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added to User:Tony Sidaway/Desk RJFJR 03:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC) (declined due to time constraints)[reply]

Added to User:Booyabazooka/Desk RJFJR 16:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some cleanup on the page. Have a look and let me know what you think. If it's OK, it can come off the cleanup list. --Phil Holmes 10:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine, eh, no thanks to me :D ... I guess I'll close it. ~ Booya ^Bazooka 19:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closed