Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Evaluation, Comments and Closing

This subpage is for requesting opinion on what needs to done to cleanup a taskforce article including whether it is ready to be closed.

Interested members can add {{Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Evaluation, Comments and Closing}} to their desks to place this page on it.

Comments can go on either the article subpage or this page (in which case they will be moved to the subpage peridoically).

Articles to evaluate (task force subpage and article link)

Loving Female Authority

A simple read of the article will demonstrate why it needs to be cleaned up, particularlar the latter portion of the second part of the article user:64.236.170.4
Tagged as stub in both sociology and culture. RJFJR 15:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It has a POV tag on it. RJFJR 15:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The POV tags keeps being removed, while the POV problem seems to remain. Bergsten 18:47, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, POV and poor grammar. This article actually concerns things that interest me, but how to clean it up effectively is beyond me. I think it may be a deletion candidate. --Marnen Laibow-Koser (talk) (desk) 05:49, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I think the grammer can be dealt with. I may take this up.Eagle (talk) (desk)21:31, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I did a lot of low-level rewriting. If someone feels the need to remove any templates, then by all means, do so. AnonMoos 22:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. You really helped with the NPOV problem

Why has no one contacted the Disciplinary Wives Club to get input? They are the most credible and reliable group on the Internet as far as Domestic Discipline with women leading.

Samantha Fox

This article is very badly written, can't someone rescue it? And what is with the Canadian bent? Hardly relevant to an article on someone who was an icon in Britain at the height of her fame.

Added to User:WayneRay/Desky RJFJR 04:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC) (declined, prefers to concentrate on history and poetry).[reply]

Added to User:Bibliomaniac15/Desk RJFJR 17:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC) (declined, busy)[reply]

Added to User:Heidijane/Desk RJFJR 03:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC) (accept)[reply]

I have made some changes to this article, but I don't really know enough about the subject. ARe there any other suggestions about ways of improving it? Thanks a lot. --Heidijane 10:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

4Kids Entertainment

4Kids Entertainment needs a little tlc. Ke5crz 05:15, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Added to User:Elizabeyth/Desk Ke5crz 05:17, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can't tell if this is considered done. This page was blanked so that may have been an attempt to close it. I'm going to assign it and ask for an opinion on its completeness (from someone with an interest in wikifying).

Added to User:Woohookitty/Desk RJFJR 15:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have just done a major clean-up of the criticism section, and was wondering if a removal was in order. Haemo 09:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I have updated this section again - it now, by and large, conforms to WP:STYLE. Asking if it should be removed from this page, once again. --Haemo 08:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm removing this. If you object, at a later date, feel free to re-add it. --Haemo 05:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]