Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SoxBot 14
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Xclamation point
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): PHP
Function Overview: Removing {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD}} from old AFDs
Edit period(s): Every 3 days
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details: This bot will go through all AFDs that transclude {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD}}. It then looks at the first edit date, and checks if it's more than 2 weeks old. If it is, then it removes the template. Should not be a major task.
Discussion
[edit]Is there a chance that a 3-week old AFD could be not actually closed for any reason? Anomie⚔ 02:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, that was a typo. I meant 2 weeks. And there actually could be a chance, if it's relisted a lot. If that's the case, I'll also have it check for the archival template at the top of the page. Xclamation point 02:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Checking for the archival template sounds like a much better idea than an arbitrary time limit. Doing it that way, I can't see any objection. Approved for trial (10 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. (just for good measure). Anomie⚔ 02:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How's it going? Have you had time to test this? – Quadell (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I've been busy with other stuff. I'll get the 10 edits now. Xclamation point 22:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ten edits done. Xclamation point 23:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. Looks like everything went according to plan. Anomie⚔ 01:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ten edits done. Xclamation point 23:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.