Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ScriptNastaliqBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

ScriptNastaliqBot

Operator: Omer rajput (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 15:33, Saturday May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: Not finalized yet, but it will be available at User:ScriptNastaliqBot.

Function overview: ScriptNastaliqBot changes the script used for Urdu words in English Wikipedia articles to Nastaliq.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Continuous

Estimated number of pages affected:

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes.

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No.

Function details:

ScriptNastaliqBot changes the script used for Urdu words in Wikipedia articles to Nastaliq. Nastaliq is the script preferred for the Urdu language.

Example of two scripts:

Naskh (Default) -> پاکستان
Nastaliq -> پاکستان

Discussion

Note: The user account this request is for is also listed as the Operator, but the account name does not clearly indicate that the account is a bot and the account has very few edits. Please note that WP:Bot policy states that a bot account's username should make it immediately clear that the account is in fact a bot, which is normally done by having the account name end with the word "Bot". Also note that a bot may not operate itself, so the Operator field should identify the account of the human running the bot. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Operator of the bot is corrected. This request was created using the bot-username, which automatically placed itself as the operator. The actual operator/initiator of this is Omer Rajput. Omer rajput (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please ping us when your script is ready to be tested and or looked at :) ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) any updates? ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 11:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question: How long does an operator have to reply before the request is closed as unsuccessful? MM (Report findings) ^{(Past espionage)} 14:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no official time limit. I generally try to give quite a long while for them to reply (about a month or sometimes even two), mainly because BAG is often very slow at approving requests, so it would be a bit unfair to enforce a faster response time than BAG itself. Also, I like to give a warning "e.g. If there's no response within a week, I will mark this request as expired", to give the operator a heads up. --Chris 12:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) Any updates? If there is no response soon, this request may be marked as expired. --Chris 14:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request Expired. Feel free to reopen when you're ready. --Chris 15:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.