Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SDZeroBot 7

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was

Withdrawn by operator.

SDZeroBot 7

Operator: SD0001 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 14:58, Sunday, September 20, 2020 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): Node.js

Source code available: GitHub

Function overview: Sort AFC drafts by topics

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WT:AFC#Sorting declined drafts by topics, Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Articles_for creation/2020_2#Proposal: Categorize_all_AfC_drafts_with ORES_topics_using_a_bot

Edit period(s): Continuous (daily)

Estimated number of pages affected: ~200 a day

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Sorts AFC drafts with topics determined from mw:ORES drafttopic model. See example API output for Kim Naesung. Topics in this case are "Culture.Biography.Biography*", "Culture.Literature", "Geography.Regions.Asia.Asia*" and "Geography.Regions.Asia.East Asia" -- which the bot normalizes down to "biography", "literature" and "east-asia" (the redundant "asia" is dropped). The {{draft topics}} template is used which applies the categories Category:Draft articles on East Asia, Category:Draft articles on biographies and Category:Draft articles on literature.

Only drafts being created with {{AFC submission}} template from now on are tagged.

Discussion

Approved for trial (10 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Let's have a small trial for now, so I can wrap my head around what's exactly being proposed. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by operator. Withdrawing this, because as I mentioned earlier at WT:WPAFC, the MediaWiki:AFC-submit-wizard.js would supersede this. It would be more reliable in the long run to have the script itself generate and add the tags while submitting the draft, rather than have a bot do it. I have already developed most of the wizard, will try to get around to the remaining work soon-ish. – SD0001 (talk) 17:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.