Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Rschen7754bot 6
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Rschen7754
Automatic or Manually Assisted: auto
Programming Language(s): AWB
Function Summary: Will be carrying out changes related to Wikipedia:USRD/A due to template changes.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): one time run
Edit rate requested: 10 edits per min
Already has a bot flag (Y/N):yes
Function Details: Will do the following:
- With the help of state highway categories, adding state=(state abbreviation) to {{U.S. Roads WikiProject}} transclusions on talk pages. This will generate a state-specific marker image on each transclusion and will assist in conversion if a state highway WikiProject is created.
- It has been determined that the maps= parameter is not useful. Therefore, the following conversions of parameters will take place: (find-replace)
- "maps=yes" -> "hasmap=yes"
- "mapneeded=yes" -> "hasmap=no"
This is going to be at least 8000 edits, too much for manual AWB... and I have other stuff that needs to get done, on and off wiki.
Discussion
[edit]Approved for trial (100 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. —METS501 (talk) 23:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I made about 75 edits and don't want to partially do a state... can I just declare this the end of the trial? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. (Have not reviewed edits yet). — xaosflux Talk 11:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This is an urgent task as the transclusions are now broken... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. for up to 10 edits per minute, flag already present. --ST47Talk·Desk 23:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This is an urgent task as the transclusions are now broken... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. (Have not reviewed edits yet). — xaosflux Talk 11:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.