Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RoboMaxCyberSem 3

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

RoboMaxCyberSem, task 3

Operator: MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)}

Automatic or Manually Assisted: automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB with CFD plugin

Function Summary: Recategorisation

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): daily

Edit rate requested: ~6 epm

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: ~~Moving Category:Wikipedia essays that are in userspace, into Category:User essays, as requested at Wikipedia:BOTREQ#Recategorize, and~~ Working on backlog at Wikipedia:CFD/W and Wikipedia:CFD/WU. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 11:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I was actually planning on doing the essay changes as I posted on the bot requests page, do you want me to do it to save you a task? — E ^talk_BAG 11:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to do it if you already have the approval. In that case this request will be only about Wikipedia:CFD/W. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 12:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (100 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. As you know, the edit summary should contain the CFD log. -- maelgwn - talk 10:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be doing the essays task, as I have offered to take control of it to MaxSem to save some stress. See Wikipedia:BRFA#EBot_III. — E ^talk_BAG 12:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any update on the trial? — E ^talk_BAG 17:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had no time for it, will make a run soon. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 14:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 21:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please give this bot a different name. ^Dlae│_here 15:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because... ? MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 21:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. The edits seem excellently done and I do not personally see a problem with the username. Discussions regarding this may be taken elsewhere. — E ^talk_BAG 23:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.