Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RileyBot 5

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

RileyBot 5

Operator: Riley Huntley (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 03:06, Wednesday February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Find user and user talk pages that transclude {{Sandbox heading}} and replace the template with {{User sandbox}}.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Hazard-Bot 4

Edit period(s): Weekly

Estimated number of pages affected: 87 pages for the first run, I predict 1-10 pages every week.

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Find user and user talk pages that transclude {{Sandbox heading}} and replace the template with {{User sandbox}} as {{Sandbox heading}} is misleading "Content will not stay permanently; this page is automatically cleaned regularly, and may be overwritten by other testing users. If you want to start editing in a clear sandbox, click here." and such. -- Cheers, Riley 03:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Yes, seems to have built up again :) Hazard-SJ ✈ 04:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, thanks! Forgot to add that -.- -- Cheers, Riley 04:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - With that being said, is this code identical to that of HazardBot?—cyberpower ^Chat_Offline 16:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as exact as it could get. (well for AWB anyways) -- Cheers, Riley 23:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That answer is somewhat elusive for me. Did hazard write and you copied it or did you write this yourself?—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 12:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. MBisanz ^talk 14:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did a run and only got 27 edits because of a different format is mainly used; will request to fix that format later today. -- Cheers, Riley 16:15, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting to do the following as well; (please note this is all in the user and user talk namespace)
- Replace {{Please leave this line alone (template sandbox heading)}} with {{User sandbox}}
- Replace {{Please leave this line alone (tutorial sandbox heading)}} with {{User sandbox}}
- Replace {{Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading)}} (redirects to {{User sandbox}}) with {{User sandbox}} Modified at 22:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- If one of the following templates is on the page more than once, replace all sandbox templates on page with {{User sandbox}}
- If after replacement there is more than one {{User sandbox}}, remove all instances but one instance of {{User sandbox}}. When removing duplicate instances, remove the hidden html code found at User:Riley Huntley/Grey sandbox with it. (it will only remove that code) -- Cheers, Riley 21:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it all looks good as long as the bot is {{nobots}} compliant! ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 22:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exclusion compliant. :) -- Cheers, Riley 22:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} Requesting the above changes to be approved for a trial. -- Cheers, Riley 07:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. as before. Maxim_(talk) 16:12, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. [1] - Only thing I could have done better (looking back at the contribs) is the edit summary. -- Cheers, Riley 23:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. MBisanz ^talk 03:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.