Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 13
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Qwerfjkl (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 16:32, Friday, June 10, 2022 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): AWB
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Substitute {{PH wikidata}} in articles
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests#Substitute inappropriate uses of PH wikidata in article text.
Edit period(s): one time run
Estimated number of pages affected: <1800
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Apply the regex (?<!\n *\|.+)\{\{PH wikidata
→ {{subst:PH wikidata
(avoids lines starting with pipes, as in infoboxes).
I've just filed this as a BRFA because otherwise I'll forget, feel free to ignore this until Task 12 is sorted out below.
Discussion
[edit]- Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Qwerfjkl: --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @TheSandDoctor, see these 50 contributions. If it's desirable to skip all uses in templates, that can be done. ― Qwerfjkltalk 14:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Qwerfjkl: Thank you for this! Let's give this a couple days to see if anyone has any feedback. TheSandDoctor Talk 04:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- For the table at the top, Trial complete. ― Qwerfjkltalk 22:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Qwerfjkl: Thank you for this! Let's give this a couple days to see if anyone has any feedback. TheSandDoctor Talk 04:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @TheSandDoctor, see these 50 contributions. If it's desirable to skip all uses in templates, that can be done. ― Qwerfjkltalk 14:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Qwerfjkl: --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Approved. Under normal circumstances, I would prefer to leave the close for someone else. However, given the backlog, lack of recent BAG activity (myself included), and the fact that this task is uncontroversial and based on how well the trial went, I am inclined to make an exception for this. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.