Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ProcBot 9

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was

Denied.

ProcBot 9

Operator: ProcrastinatingReader (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 18:40, Monday, August 16, 2021 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s):

Source code available:

Function overview: Management of Wikipedia:Editing restrictions

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Regular runs

Estimated number of pages affected: 1

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Manage the archiving of Wikipedia:Editing restrictions according to the criteria at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Archive. Users inactive or indefinitely blocked for a sufficient duration will be moved from the main list to the respective section in the archive page. Users who become active again will be moved back to the main list.

Discussion

Isn't this a duplicate of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TheSandBot 9? Primefac (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yes. Didn't know that task existed. TheSandDoctor It may need some tweaks to its variables. eg this indeffed user in 2018 who is still on the main page, this (indeffed since 2017 but realistically since 2012). this since 2015, this since 2014, etc. Some made edits to their "User talk" but that's excluded from counting as "activity". ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Denied. Duplicate task. No prejudice against re-opening if TheSandDoctor retires their bot task. Primefac (talk) 20:58, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.