Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MoohanBOT 3

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

MoohanBOT 3

Operator: Jamesmcmahon0 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 12:24, Tuesday August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual:Automatic

Programming language(s):AWB

Source code available:Standard AWB with the below Regex

Function overview:Run through Category:Stubs and remove {{stub}} from any page that matches "\-stub\}\}" i.e. more fine grained stub tag exists on the page.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):The problem was discovered whilst trialling MoohanBOT 2

Edit period(s):Periodically (Would be run just before running Task 2)

Estimated number of pages affected:less than 100 per run (probably significantly less)

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No):Yes

Function details:Run through Category:Stubs and remove {{stub}} from any page that matches "\-stub\}\}" i.e. more fine grained stub tag exists on the page.

Discussion

Approved for trial (50). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. No issues that I can see. Probably will take a longer time since there are few pages in the cat. You can nudge this if it takes too long to get that many. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yeah, I'll wait till there's maybe 50+ then hopefully it will give the bot at least a few pages to trial on... Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The category is being kept pretty small, I ran it on just now and a few days ago, the bot edited 4 pages and all seems fine ([1], [2], [3] and [4]) I'll keep running it as and when there are enough pages and post a selection of the edits here. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 13:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bot just committed another 10 edits (Stubs Category was up to about 300), all of them were fine. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 10:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Simple, low-fequency task. Previous approval for similar task. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:31, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.