Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mdann52 bot 10

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.

Mdann52 bot 10

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Mdann52 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 19:25, Tuesday, October 27, 2015 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Auto

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: standard

Function overview: Adds/Remove XfD notices from bulk discussions

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): one time runs

Estimated number of pages affected: who knows

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): NA

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: For situations like User talk:Mdann52#Lists of airline destinations, where lots of XfD tags need adding/removing. Hopeing for speedy approval, as this is not contriversial. I'll use the same code as my last run (WP:Bots/Requests for approval/Mdann52 bot 7)

Discussion

Speedily Approved. (This case only.) Primarily for the technical aspect; this should be fine (are you also adding {{Old AfD}}, though?). I'm not really sure why you ran the tagging without approval but want approval for de-tagging. However, I urge more caution when doing this sort of mass-AfDing in general (less of a concern for other XfDs). If there are so many articles that you are unable to manually tag each for deletion, then I doubt you've made sure there aren't exceptional cases that make individual articles undeserving of deletion while others should be deleted. I note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pages in Category:Lists of airline destinations and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 March 12#Natural "death by cause" categories were both closed as keep with a fair amount of opposition to the way the nomination was conducted. — Earwig ^talk 06:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.