Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mdann52 IMG bot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

Mdann52 IMG bot

Operator: Mdann52 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 19:42, Friday July 11, 2014 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Manual

Programming language(s): uses WP:FTCG

Source code available: Yes, see WP:FTCG

Function overview: Tags files moved to Commons with {{now commons}}

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): when needed

Estimated number of pages affected: NA; initially a few hundred, but may escalate

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): no

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No):no

Function details: After transferring to Commons, tags the file page with {{Now commons}}. (I would delete them directly, but as I'm not an admin, I'm not allowed to run an admin bot to do this...)

Discussion

Perhaps there is already a bot moving them properly? -- Magioladitis (talk) 06:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Magioladitis: no, not to my knowledge. Tagging them with the now commons template may be better, as it allows another user to review the edits (FYI, I have also started a BRFA over on c:Commons:Bots/Requests/Mdann52 bot. --Mdann52talk to me! 15:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mdann52 I am waiting feedback from your BOTREQ at commons. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

((BotTrial|edits=50)) Let's catch some attention! -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I am currently on a mobile data only connection (limited to 1 GB...), so will have to postpone this for a week when I will be back home, however this should be a (fairly quick) task to complete with only the odd human error (!) --Mdann52talk to me! 19:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please create a userpage (for this bot account). — xaosflux ^Talk 02:14, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdann52: I see no traffic in the commons botreq. Any developments on this one? -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Magioladitis: I am awaiting approval over there before proceeding too far with trials etc. I have done some of the trial on my main and bot accounts (unfortunately, as I am unable to view my deleted edits, I am unable to give exact numbers until I get hold of the logs), but from the edits I have made so far, I am yet to encounter any major issues, either here (which is just adding {{nowcommons}}, or over at Commons. Unfortunately, it is the latter which has slowed down, but I'll ping a crat over there and see what I can do. --Mdann52talk to me! 11:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdann52: Ping me when bot trial is done or bot request in commons is approved. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:43, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mdann52 it's been more than 2 months. What should we do? -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Magioladitis: It's been approved over there now. --Mdann52talk to me! 18:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

((BotTrial|edits=50)) Let's catch some attention! -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:34, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

8 done (keeping tally here in case any get deleted!). --Mdann52talk to me! 17:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.