Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MarkelBot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Withdrawn by operator.
Operator: Chester Markel (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 15:16, Wednesday May 18, 2011 (UTC)
Automatic or Manual: Manually reviewed on a per-edit basis
Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Renaming of internal links from Walibi World to Walibi Holland, and correction of typographical errors.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Walibi_Holland
Edit period(s): Continuous
Estimated number of pages affected: 500 per day.
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes, integral feature of AWB
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): No
Function details: Internal links to Walibi World will be renamed to Walibi Holland where contextually appropriate (not a discussion of historical events during which the park may have held the old name.) Potential typographical errors in articles, identified from a database scan, will be corrected using the AWB feature for this purpose, subject to per-edit approval by the operator for accuracy.
Discussion
[edit]- If you are going to be manually checking each edit to ensure context, the task would not require bot approval. You could even do this on your main account if you wanted. We only approve automated tasks or other automated editing tasks. MBisanz talk 03:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
It doesn't seem as though you're intending to run a bot, nor that the tasks you wish to do require any kind of approval from this part of the project. You are already allowed to proceed with this proposal. - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser#Rules_of_use states that the software should be run from a flagged bot account if one is "regularly making more than a few edits a minute." Wikipedia:Bot_policy#Assisted_editing_guidelines also recommends that "processes that are operated at higher speeds, with a high volume of edits" be operated with bot approval, even if every edit is reviewed before being saved. I want to operate AWB at up to six edits per minute. Chester Markel (talk) 04:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, even at that speed, you don't need our approval. I admire your caution, but feel free to cite my statement here if anyone complains you are editing too fast. You can use the bot account if you want, but it doesn't need to be flagged by us. MBisanz talk 06:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, withdrawn. Thanks. Chester Markel (talk) 07:06, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, even at that speed, you don't need our approval. I admire your caution, but feel free to cite my statement here if anyone complains you are editing too fast. You can use the bot account if you want, but it doesn't need to be flagged by us. MBisanz talk 06:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.