Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Maelgwnbot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Maelgwn
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic - supervised
Programming Language(s): python (using pywikipedia)
Function Summary: Replace old fields from Infobox Biography to those in Template:Infobox Person.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One time run
Edit rate requested: 4 edit per minute
Already has a bot flag (Y/N):
Function Details: See Template talk:Infobox_Person#Comparison_table. I will replace the fields that were used for Infobox Biography with those for Infobox Person. They where recently merged. Per this request. Using replace.py, and working through the pages that use the template.
Discussion
[edit]My first bot request. Seems fairly straight forward. See Special:Contributions/Maelgwnbot for a few trials. :: maelgwn - talk 09:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks fine to me. Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Probably not overly needed, just to make sure everythings ok. When you've done it, let us know, and we'll take it from there! Reedy Boy 09:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok trial done. No problems there. Am I good to go? :: maelgwn - talk 11:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Edits look good, with no errors that I can see. — E talkbots 11:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok trial done. No problems there. Am I good to go? :: maelgwn - talk 11:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can i change my request to say 4 edits per minute. Just noticed how many there are to be changed. :: maelgwn - talk 11:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yup, fine with me, ive changed it. Thought 1 per minute was a bit slow! Approved. Reedy Boy 11:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks guys, just getting moving :-) :: maelgwn - talk 11:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Just needs flagging. Reedy Boy 11:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks guys, just getting moving :-) :: maelgwn - talk 11:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.