Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JoshurBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

JoshurBot

Operator: josh (talk)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): Java

Function Summary: Creates project wide watchlists

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Weekly

Edit rate requested: Upto 30 edits per minute

Function Details: The bot creates a page containing links to all the pages related to a project. The list of articles can be based either on a category related to the project or pages that have the project's template in their talk page. It's grown out of User:joshurtree/createwatchlist.js that I originally created to do the job.

Discussion

User:SQLBot does pretty much the same task... It's pretty uncontroversial, I don't see a problem with this task... SQL ^{Query me!} 18:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

30 epm?? Sorry, but can you use a lower rate? Thanks, CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 18:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I missed that. Really, so long as it respects maxlag (say, 5 or 6) and, it's flagged, the epm doesen't matter so much. Does the bot respect maxlag? If so, what's the maxlag setting going to be? SQL ^{Query me!} 18:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've lobbed some maxlag code in for 5 seconds. The 30 edits a minute is only a theoretical upper limit. It currently only has 3 projects using it and one of them takes about 5 seconds to deal with due to the number of items in it. As its run so irregually it could be as slow or fast as you like. josh (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Let's see what she's capable of.

Approved for trial (250 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Thanks, SQL ^{Query me!} 04:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How's this task coming along? SQL ^{Query me!} 09:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as expired. — Werdna talk 13:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.