Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Hot Riley Bot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Denied.

Hot Riley Bot

Operator: Hot Riley (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 21:00, Sunday, April 10, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual:Supervised

Programming language(s):Java

Source code available:AWB

Function overview:Reverts vandalism

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s):Daily

Estimated number of pages affected:1000

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No):No

Function details: This bot Reverts vandalism i know this is what Clue Bot Does and my request was right the last time the only thing i did wrong was the Bots name

Sorry Riley Huntley for Trying to Copy your bot Now anyway Come to this page ASAP

Discussion

Okay so my Last request was Rejected because the bots name was the same as Riley Huntleys bot

So This Bot needs a Trial

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} - Your request and listing have been malformed, and this clearly contains "Vague or incomplete details" - do you have a serious task description to add? Quick aside: how do you plan to use the AWB framework for general anti-vandalism? — xaosflux ^Talk 23:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The user account this request is for is also listed as the Operator, but the account name does not clearly indicate that the account is a bot and the account has very few edits. Please note that WP:Bot policy states that a bot account's username should make it immediately clear that the account is in fact a bot, which is normally done by having the account name end with the word "Bot". Also note that a bot may not operate itself, so the Operator field should identify the account of the human running the bot. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It Reverts Vandalism Using Twinkle

That's not even close to being clear enough for a trial. Please provide a walk through of how your bot will work (process flow). — xaosflux ^Talk 23:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denied. Bottom line, this is not going to happen. Your own personal recent records of vandalizes articles preclude you from running a vandalism-related bot for anytime in the near future. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.