Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FlrnBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

FlrnBot

Operator: <Flrn^talk>

Automatic or Manually Assisted: automatic

Programming Language(s): pywikipedia

Function Summary: interwikis and double redirects fixing

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): when I'm online

Edit rate requested: it's automatic script

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: Just standard Python scripts.

Discussion

Please specify the edit rate you are requesting (6 edits/minute, for example, is recommended). — madman bum and angel 19:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

heads up the m:Pywikipedia has a coded maxlag = 5 edit rate limit. β^_command 22:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed; however, I'd like some indication that the contributor is familiar with bot operation and Wikipedia's bot policy. And will be communicative regarding his bot. — madman bum and angel 00:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not changing edit rate, it is standard. --<Flrn^talk> 13:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think madman is asking for you to change it. I think he's after you acknowledging you're going to use the maxlag = 5 that pywikipedia uses —Reedy Boy 11:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that change rate of my bot isn't more than allowed. In russian Wikipedia there's no problems. --<Flrn^talk> 14:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 Points - 1, this isnt the Russian Wikipedia. And 2, no one is asking you to change the edit rate, just confirm that you are going to use the maxlag = 5 standard in Pywikipedia —Reedy Boy 16:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't these two different requests? Soxred93 has a boring sig 03:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request Expired. — madman bum and angel 02:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.