Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 20
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 08:18, Tuesday, March 19, 2019 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): JavasScript
Source code available: Not written yet
Function overview: Add short descriptions to outlines
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Outlines#Proposal: Bot-added short descriptions
Edit period(s): One time run, then as needed
Estimated number of pages affected: ~400800 to start with
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Add a short description to Wikipedia outlines (see Category:Wikipedia outlines). Since there was no response at wikiproject outlines, I think this may be a case of Wikipedia:Silence and consensus.
Discussion
[edit]- Approved for trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. post results when done. — xaosflux Talk 13:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I realized that this task should include pages in the subcategories of Category:Wikipedia outlines, and have adjusted the estimate accordingly --DannyS712 (talk) 02:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Xaosflux: Trial complete., see [1] (search for task 20). I didn't see any errors or issues --DannyS712 (talk) 02:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Code located at User:DannyS712 test/Outline bot.js - I would remove the category depth limit (see note above) and the edit per run limit (set to 25 for trial) --DannyS712 (talk) 02:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. Task approved. — xaosflux Talk 02:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.