Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 15

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

DannyS712 bot 15

Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 08:34, Saturday, March 16, 2019 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): JavaScript

Source code available:

Function overview: adding {{Germany district OSM map}} to the 'map' parameter of {{Infobox District DE}}, where QXXXX is the Wikidata ID of the German state the district belongs to

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WP:BOTREQ#OSM location map for German districts

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: <400

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Using the API, retrieve the wikidata wikibase_item for a page, and then add the corresponding parameter to {{Infobox District DE}}.

Discussion

@Underlying lk and GreenC: filed! --DannyS712 (talk) 08:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. @DannyS712: I thought I'd done this last night, but apparently not. Anyways, approved for trial. As usual, please post the diffs here when done and take all the time you need. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor:

Trial complete. see the 49 edits made at [1]. @Underlying lk: I didn't see any errors, but I also am not as familiar with the template and its use as you are. Can you take a look? --DannyS712 (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

parent_subdivision should be the QID of the state, for instance Lower Saxony (Q1197) for Hildesheim (district) and all the other districts in Niedersachsen; see this diff.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 00:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Underlying lk: hang on, so its not the QXXXX of the page itself? Then how do I find what page it is for? I'm rolling back the edits, since they were all wrong then. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyS712: This query can be used for that.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Underlying lk: so just to confirm, the actual Q value to be added is the one listed under "located_in_the_administrative_territorial_entity", for each page labeled "rural_district_of_Germany". Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyS712: Correct.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Underlying lk: So I should use User:DannyS712 test/infobox3.json instead of User:DannyS712 test/infobox2.json for the source? --DannyS712 (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyS712: seems right to me.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Underlying lk: in that case, @TheSandDoctor: would you be willing to approve an extended trial? I'll check the first bunch of edits the bot makes to ensure that it links to a correct map. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for extended trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. @DannyS712: --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: shouldn't this be {{BotExtendedTrial}}? --DannyS712 (talk) 03:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyS712: You're right, it was a case of "thought I did one thing, but did another." Fixed

--TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor:

Trial complete. 25 edits made [2]. Code is at User:DannyS712 test/Map bot.js, actual list of pages to edit is at User:DannyS712 test/infobox4.json (infobox3 but removing pages that don't exist on enwiki). So of those listed won't be edited because they have to map parameter to replace. @Underlying lk: I looked, and don't see any errors. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits look fine to me.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 13:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I checked a few more, and all the maps seem to be working. --DannyS712 (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since there was no error on this, and the (limited) response seems positive, and no one objected after about 2-3 weeks,

Approved.. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.