Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Colourful Bot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Denied.
Operator: Colourful Bling (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 18:51, Sunday April 15, 2012 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Manual
Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: General typo fixing, performs very basic tasks.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Monday & Wednesday: 1-2 hours - Sunday: 3-5 hours
Estimated number of pages affected: 120 pages per hour
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No
Function details: Looks for general typing errors and fixes them. I created the bot on the German Wikipedia (see m:de:Spezial:Logbuch/Colourful_Bling)
Discussion
[edit]Sorry, but I will close this per WP:BOTNOTNOW and no necessity for a bot account for these tasks. You can do these tasks on your main account and should seek AWB approval instead. You will only need a bot account if the edit rates exceed manual editing or the community raises concerns. You also have very few edits and bots are generally approved for editors that have been on wiki for a while. If you had, you would know we don't approve typo correction bots and the description of "function details" must include specific details. "very basic tasks" is also not something we can approve. Feel free to reapply when you gain more experience and have specific tasks in mind that a bot can do, such as those compliant with WP:CONTEXTBOT. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.