Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Bender the Bot 5
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Operator: Bender235 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 15:25, Sunday, December 4, 2016 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): AWB
Source code available: upon request
Function overview: replace http://
with https://
for selected domains.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WPR: Why we should convert external links to HTTPS wherever possible and WPR: Should we convert existing Google and Internet Archive links to HTTPS?
Edit period(s): one-time run
Estimated number of pages affected: 50,000 ± 20,000
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: As promised, the "NGO conversion" task took only a day to finish, so I want to convert external links to The Guardian, a fairly often used RS on Wikipedia. On the forefront of investigative journalism, they enabled HTTPS support for readers' privacy long ago. It's time we convert our old links.
Concretely, I want to convert http://www.theguardian.com/
to https://www.theguardian.com/
. Notice, however, that their British TLD http://www.guardian.co.uk/
now also redirects to https://www.theguardian.com/
. I want to convert both of these.
Discussion
[edit]- Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux Talk 16:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete, results as always here. I spotted no issues. However, I accidentally overlooked that you only approved a 50 edit trial; I ran 100 edits, like in the previous RfA. Sorry about that. --bender235 (talk) 17:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved. Task approved. — xaosflux Talk 14:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.