Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BU RoBOT 19

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

BU RoBOT 19

Operator: BU Rob13 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 16:49, Thursday, June 9, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Substitute from the sandbox of {{Redirect6}} to convert to {{Redirect}}

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_1#Template:Redirect6

Edit period(s): One-time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 655

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: I've converted this template to a wrapper in the sandbox. Unfortunately, the wrapper only works when substituted and can't be transcluded, so it would temporarily break all transclusions if I copied it to the main template and then used AnomieBOT to substitute it. Instead, a very quick bot run is needed to substitute directly from the sandbox. I've completed technically near-identical tasks before. See Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BU RoBOT 2 and Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BU RoBOT 8. I've created testcases at Template:Redirect6/testcases. The first hatnote in each section is what happens when the sandbox is substituted, the second hatnote is what happens when it isn't substituted (i.e. showing that it can't be transcluded), and the third hatnote is the current template. The first lines are exactly the expected appearance as laid out at the TfD discussion which was linked above.

A quick 10-edit trial (on my main account, of course) can be found here. Additionally, the regex is incredibly simple and posted below, so I'm hoping this can get through the process quickly.

\{\{\s*Redirect6\s*\| to {{subst:Redirect6/sandbox|

Discussion

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Contribs. I looked through all diffs and found no errors. ~ Rob^Talk 18:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Task approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.