Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Addbot 10

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Request Expired.

Addbot 10

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): Python

Function Summary: Fixing double redirects

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Using redirect.py to fix redirects.

Discussion

I'm inclined to trial, what do other BAGGers think? Soxred 93 07:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

No objections. BJ^Talk 07:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure, we can always use another double-rd-fixer. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Approved for trial (2 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Soxred 93 15:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. BJ^Talk 06:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Request Expired. BJ^Talk 06:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.