Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Jake Wartenberg

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for BAG membership. Please do not modify it.

BAG Nomination: Jake Wartenberg

Jake Wartenberg (talk · contribs)

Jake has been an editor for over two years and an admin since August. He is involved in and aware of technical areas of WP such as edit filters and account creator. He will be able to use these skills in reviewing bots and understands community consensus. Finally, he has access to the Toolserver, which is very useful as many bots are hosted from there and may need testing on how to operate from there on enwiki. Therefore, I am putting him forward for BAG membership. MBisanz ^talk 02:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate acceptance:

I accept. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 03:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

MBisanz, you may want to revise your opening sentence. NW (Talk) 03:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. MBisanz ^talk 04:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Support MBisanz ^talk 02:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - would make a fine addition. — The Earwig @ 22:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No objections, Jake will do well on the BAG. Good Luck, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 03:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support no problems here Tan | 39 03:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Appears to know this field well. Best wishes. Jusdafax 03:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I think he'd do a fine job. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support based on editor's observed behavior, actions, and comments, and taking the points made in the nom as evidence of sufficient technical knowledge. --Cybercobra (talk) 01:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sure. Tiptoety ^talk 05:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pile on support. Would be beneficial to the project for Jake to have the rights. Blurpeace 21:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support comes supplied with clue and sense. Useful combination. billinghurst sDrewth 00:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support No objections, and I trust the nominator's judgement. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support experienced, balanced, thoughtful. Josh Parris 16:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as successful Pak aran 05:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above BAG membership discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.