Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Chris G
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for BAG membership. Please do not modify it.
- Closed as successful. No concerns raised for over two weeks. =Nichalp «Talk»= 16:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BAG Nomination: Chris G
[edit]- Chris G (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Hi, as you can see I'm nomming myself for BAG membership again. I'll keep this short since you probably know most of this already. Basicly I run three bots:
- Chris G Bot 3 archives WP:CHU(/SUL) - also used to be a statusbot
- Chris G Bot 2 a clone of PockBot
- Chris G Bot does odd tasks
My old bots were written in perl using perlwikipedia but I have since switched to PHP using a slightly modifed version of Cobi's classes. --Chris 12:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support experienced admin and bot operator. He understands the BRFA system and would make well needed addition to the BAG. BJTalk 12:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: Again? What happened before? how do you turn this on 12:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chris, I think the color of your present signature makes it easy to confuse with a redlink. I don't think that's an ideal situation for someone who is a "public face" of the project to novice users and users who come from other language projects. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree; the red is quite different: Chris (using current red) Chris (using broken link red) how do you turn this on 13:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You're assuming both accurate color representation on monitors and good color memory among the readership. Neither of those is a safe assumption. Anyway, I left my comment for Chris. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And I left my comment for you saying I disagree with your opinion that it's "easy" to confuse. how do you turn this on 13:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've switched it to green --Chris 08:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And I left my comment for you saying I disagree with your opinion that it's "easy" to confuse. how do you turn this on 13:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You're assuming both accurate color representation on monitors and good color memory among the readership. Neither of those is a safe assumption. Anyway, I left my comment for Chris. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Experienced admin, good bot operator. I also don't oppose on signatures for an RfBAG (although, it can be seen as a redlink). Xclamation point 15:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Has shown himself to be a competent operator. MBisanz talk 22:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support and thank you for fixing the signature. how do you turn this on 15:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support same as last time. SQLQuery me! 06:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
KeepOh wait, its a BAG nom, support. Mr.Z-man 23:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Support —Reedy 09:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above BAG membership discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.