Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/March 2007/Teabing-Leigh

Case Filed On: 17:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

• Teabing-Leigh (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

• Kjartan8 (talk · contribs)William M. Connolley (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

• Direct Action Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

• Answer:Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

• Answer: Policy violation. Personal Attacks. Content dispute.

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

• Answer: Discussed the issue. Given the sources.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

• Answer: 1. Kjartan banned for personal attacks. 2. Direct Action Day article protected at a fairer balance than currently exhibited.

Summary:

Direct Action Day was a POV article. I gave sources which were easily verifiable. Kjartan declared they were "failed verification" without actually checking the sources which he later admitted.

Kjartan made extremely abusive personal attacks for which he was reported by another Wikipedian at WP:ANI.

The other wikipedian, a Sysop?, protected the article at a point without reverting the one sided tags by kjartan.

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

• Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

• Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

• Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

• Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: NEW

Advocate Status:

• None assigned.

CASE WITHDRAWN Teabing-Leigh 14:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)