Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/March 2007/Mpoulshock
Case Filed On: 13:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedian filing request:
- Mpoulshock (talk · contribs)
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
Questions:
[edit]Have you read the AMA FAQ?
- Answer: Yes
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: It's not a dispute; it's a question: I'm looking for a list of all cases that have come before the Arbitration committee. I'm doing research on Wikipedia's arbitration process as an emerging system of case law.
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
- Answer: N/A
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
- Answer: See above.
Summary:
[edit]Discussion:
[edit]Followup:
[edit]When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer:
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer:
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer:
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer:
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer:
AMA Information
[edit]Case Status: NEW
Advocate Status:
- None assigned.