Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/April 2007/wolvesbadboyz

Case Filed On: 12:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

• wolvesbadboyz (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

• AMALAS (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

• Ammo 'The DoorMan' Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

• Answer: Y

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

• Answer: CONTENT DISPUTE

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

• Answer: N/A

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

• Answer: THE DELETED PAGE RE-INSTATED

Discussion:

This page was written about a man who is a legend in our city as a champion street fighter and doorman. He's not just known in our city of Wolverhampton England, But also Birmingham and Manchester. Its extremely out of order i think for the article to be deleted, it took many months to compile the information and there is more information on the way. He's a local hero, talked about by many people. Theres very few people like this around nowdays so its good to remember them while we can. It would be such a shame if the information about this man was not to be presented on wikipedia and allowed to be deleted by a person not knowing or caring about what really goes on in the world. If you knew the man the article was written about you would completely understand.

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

• Answer: y

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

• Answer: n/a

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

• Answer: n/a

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

• Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

• Answer: the allowing of articles about real genuine people not be removed because people dont like it or because they think there is not enough evidence.

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

• Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: NEW

Advocate Status:

• None assigned.