Wikipedia:Article Referencing Drive/Archives
Appearance
Successful nominations
[edit]- Nominated October 11, 2006
- Support
- Rampart 15:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- HereToHelp 12:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC) How is this unsourced?
- Kevin_b_er 16:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Let's get this article some sources and references.
- Comments
- This is less obscure than my last suggestion, and it has zero sources! Whee Rampart 15:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nominated October 20, 2006
- Support
- Fsotrain09 20:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- —
this is messedrocker
(talk)
21:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC) - Frazzydee|✍ 04:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
This article is a FA from the "brilliant prose" days -- it has no references whatsoever. -Fsotrain09 20:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Good gravy! This needs imminent attention. —
this is messedrocker
(talk)
21:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Absolutely! All featured articles should be referenced. Note that it's currently undergoing featured article review. If a note hasn't been left there already, we should ask for the decision to be deferred until we're done with it here. -Frazzydee|✍ 04:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- As the one who put it up for FAR, I'll do that, Frazzydee. Although the review hasn't had much activity lately in any case. -Fsotrain09 02:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nominated November 14, 2006
- Support
- Dev920 (Please peer review here.) 20:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- BhaiSaab talk 21:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Important article - no citations. A terrible situation that needs correction. Dev920 (Please peer review here.) 20:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Nominated November 17, 2006
- Support
- ZeWrestler Talk 17:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- selfworm 22:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- JoeSmack Talk 07:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- One of the most important ancient civilizations that contains a lot of unsourced statements and potential original research. Could use a collaboration like this to fix it up. --ZeWrestler Talk 17:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Failed nominations
[edit]- Support
- Comments
- This article has great length and detail by now, but no inline citations and a very pith but lacking 'References' section. It needs help! JoeSmack Talk 03:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support
- Comments
- Many unsourced statements, and what references are there need cleaning up or replacement (things like geocities and google caches). Rampart 23:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nominated October 21, 2006
- Support
- -Gphoto 03:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- —
this is messedrocker
(talk)
20:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- Important article, but is lacking cited references. -Gphoto 03:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)