Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Steering Committee/2011-02-04
Appearance
?)Wikipedia Ambassador Steering Committee
2011-02-03
Members present:
- Annie Lin
- PJ Tabit
- Cheryl Moy
- Sage Ross
- Fletcher Commons (partially)
Agenda
[edit]- How will we select future Steering Committee members?
- How do we support professors who come on board in the middle of the spring semester?
- How do we train Campus Ambassadors who come on board in the next months?
- How do we want to proceed with the "Regional Ambassadors" idea, which I brought up during the most recent trainings?
- What will the Online Ambassador training look like?
- We also need to update each other about spring 2011 plans and Online Ambassador recruitment/selection.
Proceedings
[edit]Elections:
Objectives:
- Represent OAs
- Represent CAs
- Represent GLAM Ambassadors?
- Represent other stakeholders (professors and students)
- What value would professors have as committee members?
- valuble for recruiting other professors
- The makeup of the Steering Committee:
- X slots of CAs
- Y slots for OAs
- Z slot(s) for at-large
- Other CA/OA
- WMF staff
- Member of larger WP community
- other interested ppl
- $ slots for GLAM Ambassadors? (Down the road but not this election.)
- Advisory roles - not full members
- Could be professors, students, WMF staff, other interested parties
- Fewer responsibilities, fewer privileges
Minimum: 3 CA, 3 OA, 1 at-large
- Concern: Both OA/CA count as 0.5?
- Concern: systemic bias against CAs who were not already well-known Wikipedians
(PJ will send out minutes & remaining questions/concerns, and keep discussion going.)
(Cheryl will send minutes/outcomes to Google Group and also put onto Wikipedia.)
Selecting Full Members of the Committee
Voting Eligibility Requirements:
- Letting any ambassador votes
- Letting any ambassador who has served one term (or almost one term) vote
- Letting anyone in the WP community vote
- Has some drawbacks, but does have the political advantage of drawing in the community and gaining their support
Ideal steering committee member?
(Entire committee should have good blend of skills/experiences/characteristics)
- Every member
- Hard worker, willing to spend time/effort
- Proactive in improving the WAP
- Commitment to the project / Wikimedia movement
- Reliable Internet access
- Is comfortable working in a group!
- Committee as a whole
- Greatness at the roles of CA and an OA
- Can contribute innovative ideas towards sustainability of program
- Able to see large picture
- Deep knowledge of Wikipedia and its community
- Strong teaching skills
- Represents multiple continents?
- Represents the various stakeholders in the WAP
- Commitment to engage WP community & larger Ambassador community in decision-making
Election timeline:
- Meeting to talk about proposal content, on February 13th
- Steering Committee finalizes proposal, by February
- Who is eligible to run
- Who is eligible to vote
- Voting system
- Voting mechanism/logistics
- Steering Committe presents proposal to entire Ambassador group & WP community
- Discussion phase: shoot for a deadline of February 20th?
- End of semester
- Mid semester
next meetings: Feb. 13, 27; Mar. 13, 27
Things to consider:
- How much longer for Committee to be around?
- List of new policies that are not immediate for us to discuss but for future committee
- Goals/more defined role of Committee in the future?
- have liason to Wikimedia Foundation (possibly in advisory role?)