Tradition was a core article, and had been selected for v. 0.5 of Wikipedia:Version 1.0. Maybe we should try to select articles that are (or should be) targets for Wikipedia:Version 1.0, as Theatre is. -- Donald Albury14:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This seems like an excellent choice. Better defined than the last one, although also has more content already (a lot of which could probably be sourced pretty easily). And I agree focusing on core and/or vital articles, at least most of the time.--ragesoss (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rational Since Obsessive Compulsive Disorder looks good, I figured that this would be a good ironic article to edit. Besides, it does need inline citations and could always use expansion.
Rationale One of the first skyscrapers ever built, this building is a National Historic Landmark and is in sore need of attention; this stub is rated top-importance for WikiProject Architecture and there's a good volume of sources out there.
This one would be best left off a couple of weeks, I think, to get the classes involved and have a massive collaboration :) sonia♫03:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To get a ton of classes involved in a project might result in chaos if there is no plan. Maybe each class could expand a section or something but a mass rush to edit the article will kill a lot of spirits if not done properly. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rationale: severely undercovered history article with fair amount of coverage in English. Numerous scholarly discussions of it, and certainly plenty of text books
