Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/The Thadman

Wikipedian filing request:

• The Thadman (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

• Aeon1006 (talk · contribs) (sorry, I had to test it on you :-) )

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

• Fluffernutter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• User talk:Aeon1006 (edit | [[Talk:User talk:Aeon1006|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

• Answer: Yep, I helped write them.

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

• Answer: Just a test of the new system. :-)

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

• Answer: None, this is a test.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

• Answer: Nothing at all :-)

Summary:

~pokes microphone~ Testing, testing, one two three.

Followup:

When the case is closed, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

• Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how polite was your Advocate?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

• Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

• Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

• Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: closed

Advocate Assigned:

• אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) 00:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC) (Ironic? Yes. :-) )