Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/September 2006/cisum.ili.dilm

Wikipedian filing request:

• cisum.ili.dilm (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

• USERNAME (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

• ARTICLE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

• Answer:

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

• Answer:

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

• Answer:

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

• Answer:

Discussion:

This is purposely so confusing as to quash all valid inquires and objections. I am not going to waste my time at this until I know this snippet has been digested. I can wait a lifetime - a singularly infrequent reality these days.

I apologize if that is the way that you feel. This system is in place to make things easier for both the Advocate and the Advocee. Even Wikipedians who are far less than technically apt and familliar with how things work here have been able to successfully fill this form out and have their problems dealt with in an appropriate manner. All of the questions and requests listed are things that an Advocate would ask for to begin with and are the bare minimum for an Advocate to be effective in understanding what your problem is, where you are in it, and how you wish to proceed. If you would like assistance, please take the time to fill things out. The AMA is a volunteer organization and we need a little bit of help before we're able to help you properly. אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) 05:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I have contacted the user on his talk page, and asked him to complete the form. I also told him that if he doesn't complete the form within the next week, the request will probably be denied. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 01:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Followup:

When the case is closed, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

• Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how polite was your Advocate?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

• Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

• Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

• Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: closed

Advocate Status:

• None assigned.

This case is declined by the AMA. The editor in question had made this request on his second edit, and has been no conflict on his first edit. If there is a real conflict, refile with information. With an edit summary of test .sandbox for kids, this doesn't seem to be a ligit request. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 21:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)