Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/September 2006/Yembi
Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
- Bodybuilding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Talk:Bodybuilding (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Bodybuilding|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Questions:
[edit]Have you read the AMA FAQ?
- Answer: Yes
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: Policy violation on Neutral Point Of View, Content dispute about a link on African Bodybuilding
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
- Answer: I've tried to discuss and explain my point of view to the user Yankees76, cf: Talk:Bodybuilding on the NTPowerHouse African Bodybuilding section
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
- Answer: I'm new on Wikipedia and I would like AMA/Advocacy to help me to restore the principle that states that an article must represent all significant views fairly and without bias, in the Bodybuilding article
Summary:
[edit]The article on Bodybuilding seems to be merely an article on AMERICAN Bodybuilding from top to bottom. I would like to show that a different kind of bodybuilding exists in sub-saharian Africa. I promised to write an article on it, but in the meantime I suggested to put a link of the only website I know that deals with that subject. The user Yankees76 keeps on removing it.
Discussion:
[edit]All relevant discussion in this diff. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 23:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Followup:
[edit]When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer:
Totally useless.
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer:
Not at all.
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer:
4
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer:
1
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer:
1
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer:
The one who was supposed to support my case was just a friend of the other user! He has just come out to support his friend, not me!
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer:
I would not request an advocate.
AMA Information
[edit]Case Status: closed
Advocate Status:
- I'll take this one. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 00:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- Advocee has not replied in 6 days, advice given, closed. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 23:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)