Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/September 2006/Kevdo

Wikipedian filing request:

Kevdo (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Duhon (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

Frat_pack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

Answer:Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

Answer:There was a dispute over sourcing. That issue has been resolved.

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

Answer:Discussion has been used effectively. Additional sources of Carell's inclusion have been sourced.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

Answer:turn off the "the page is in dispute" label at the top of the page.

Summary:

It's not really "my" side per se. Just that I see that the dispute/edit wars are over and would like the dispute label remove.

Discussion:

Kevdo, you may remove the {Content} tag from the page yourself if nobody objects to it on the discussion page at Talk:Frat Pack for a while. I'd wait a week to see if someone still objects to its removal... say around the 22nd of this month? You don't need to have someone do it for you, if you edit the Frat Pack page, it's the first thing at the top. {Content} but with 2 curly braces. If you need any more help though, feel free to post a message on User talk:Pedant and I'll be happy to help you with anything. User:Pedant 21:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, I will do that.Kevdo 16:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:SPAM as well, to make sure your insertion of links to http://www.the-frat-pack.com are not perceived as spamming, since they are to your personal commercial website. Such links are rarely appropriate, please make sure that yours are the appropriate kind. User:Pedant 21:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know it might be hard to believe but in all honesty few if any of the links to the Frat Pack Tribute site (within the article) were added by me.Kevdo 16:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Followup:

When the case is closed, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

Answer:Yes

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

Answer:Absolutely

On a scale of 1 to 5, how polite was your Advocate?

Answer:5 (best)

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

Answer:5

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

Answer:5

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

Answer:the "messaging" processes is a little clunky at Wikipedia

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

Answer:Everything was fine.

AMA Information

Case Status: closed

Advocate Status:

No advocate is needed here. I have advised User:Kevdo that there is no need to have someone else remove the {Content} tag, and that it can be removed after a suitable wait to ensure consensus. User:Pedant 21:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Closed per Pedant. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 22:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]