Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/October 2006/scotchguy

Wikipedian filing request:

• scotchguy (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

• PEERGYNT323 (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

• Single Malt Scotch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

• Answer: Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

• Answer: Policy Violation. PEERGYNT323 continues to add back spam links to his personal site after they have been removed. In addition he now has been editing my comments in the discussion page

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

• Answer: Discussion page; explaining why links were removed

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

• Answer: Banning of PEERGYNT323

Summary:

I try to maintain the integrity of the whisky pages and links - removing links that are added for purely promotional reason; personal web sites, etc. This person took offense to that and continues to replace the links. They then accused me of defacing their site and now have been repeatedly editing the discussion page

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

• Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

• Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

• Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

• Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: closed

Advocate Status:

• Open. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 21:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Closed. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 00:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)