Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.
	Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 22, 2000
Full case name	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.
Citations	529 U.S. 205 (more)
Holding
	Product design is not inherently distinctive trade dress.
Court membership
	Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor; Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy; David Souter · Clarence Thomas; Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinion
Majority	Scalia, joined by unanimous

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that product design is not inherently distinctive trade dress.^[1]^[2]

References

^ Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000).
^ "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.: The Supreme Court Steps Back from Two Pesos and Requires Secondary Meaning in All Product Design Trade Dress Cases". Santa Clara High Tech. L. J. 17: 365.

External links

Text of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[case-1] Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000).

[2] "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.: The Supreme Court Steps Back from Two Pesos and Requires Secondary Meaning in All Product Design Trade Dress Cases". Santa Clara High Tech. L. J. 17: 365.

[1]

[2]

See also

References

External links