User talk:~Mujtaba~

Recent edit to Ten Lost Tribes

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 18:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Test ~Mujtaba~ (talk) 12:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request for user:Gadri

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

~Mujtaba~ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Note:This unblock request is for User:Gadri and not for this account.

Hello, read my this reason carefully, do not ignore. I was blocked by Yamaguchi in my early days here (on wikipedia) and the reason of my block is Addition of unsourced content, i know, i added content to article called "Rai dynasty", but note that i added that content in good faith, i was not fimiliar with wikipedia rules and policies in my early days. Suddenly, someone leaved a message at my talk page that you have been blocked from editing, and that block was made by yamaguchi. Then i worried, that what it happened. Then, i decided to create a new account (because i was not fimiliar with sock puppetry in my early days on wikipedia). Then later, my second account was also blocked as a sock, "but what is sock puttry, puppetry? Whats this?" (i thought when my second account was blocked as a sock) and also whats this happening to me? (I thought). And even i wasn't fimiliar with normal unblocking system ({{unblock|1=reason}}) in my new days. Then i created another account, because i thought that it's the only way. Imagine yourself in this situation, what do you do? Blocking users is not a game, see newuser log, as i saw many other innocent users blocked, some by socking, and some by another reasons. Some of them really deserve "BLOCK" but what about others? Imagine yourself in this situation. Think, See. Why you can't just help those socks, by telling them about policies (why you willn't told me about sock puppetery, and about adding sources). Why you only blocked me :,-( see yourself in this situation. I many times pinged other editors, but why no one told me. Why? I don't want to create more accounts, because NOW i am fimiliar with some policies including sock puppetery and adding sources. See my talk page, how many times i mentioned yamaguchi, david biddulph, etc. These are old editors on wikipedia, but why just ignored me. And then, Favonian only leaved a message, but only warning message. Why you waste your time by typing warning message, why not you can only send "1" message by telling about basic policies and appreciating newbies, im telling this about "me". Think. Think. I cannot create more sock accounts on wikipedia if you can consider unblock. Seriously. Thank you. I agree now.

Decline reason:

All this unblock request achieves is to confirm that, as already stated on the talk page of your original account, you do not have the ability to contribute to an English language encyclopaedia. (Also, using a sockpuppet to evade the block on talk page access is not going to get you unblocked. That talk page block is there for a reason.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.